Albos Law relieved a client of an unpaid revolving debt which, having been assigned to an investment fund by the creditor financial institution, had been judicially claimed from her (Judgment n. 273/2022 of 23 November 2022 issued by the Court of First Instance n. 3 of Lleida). As opposition to the order for payment claim […]
On 14 December 2022, Economist&Jurist echoed a decision of the Supreme Court which overturned a ruling of the Provincial Court of Valencia and awarded a woman 3,000 euros in compensation for infringement of her right to honor by entering her data in files for non-existent debts. In the case brought before the High Court, the […]
In the previous publication of this section we talked about the reasons why it is necessary to make an extrajudicial claim before starting the preparatory steps of the lawsuit, and one of them is because it is an ideal way to interrupt the prescription period of the possible legal actions to be exercised. At Albos […]
At the moment of formalizing a representation agreement with our clients, several doubts arise, not so much in relation to the legal issues and the content of the claim, but especially in relation to the different procedures to be carried out by us in the framework of the legal services contracted. Therefore, from Albos Law, […]
Albos Law obtains a judicial authorization for the sale of the property of a disabled person, in favour of a family member, in order for him/her to have liquidity for his/her care and needs (Rule no. 279/2022 of March 17, 2022 issued by the Court of First Instance No. 40 of Barcelona). Paragraph 1 of […]
The opinion of the firm: Section 1 of article 35 of the RGPD establishes, in general, the obligation of those responsible for data processing to carry out an EIPD prior to the start-up of such processing when it is probable that, due to their nature, scope, context or purposes entail a high risk for the […]
Article by María José Alamar published in LegalToday on 01/27/2022. The opinion of the firm: Although the jurisprudence issued by the Supreme Court in relation to this matter is turning out to be unanimously dismissive for consumers and users, it is more than evident that it contradicts the jurisprudence issued by the CJEU in terms […]
Recently, the Supreme Court has ruled stating that the omission of diseases in the health questionnaire will only release the insurer from its obligation to pay compensation in cases in which intent or gross negligence of the insured is detected, in accordance with the provisions in art. 10 of the Insurance Contract Law. Specifically, through […]
- 1
- 2